|
FOR
IMMEDIATE RELEASE: May 8, 2001
Contact:
Rena Amada, Press Relations, Green Party of NJ
732-849-9050, RenaAmada@aol.com
Joe Fortunato, Chair, Green Party of NJ
973-744-5958, jfortun845@aol.com
Jane Hunter, Communications Committee, Green Party of NJ
732-560-0276, janemhunter@att.net
Nancy Allen, Media
Coordinator, Association of State Green Parties
207-326-4576, nallen@acadia.net
Scott McLarty,
Media Coordinator, Association of State Green Parties
202-518-5624, scottmclarty@yahoo.com
GREENS BLAST BUSH ADMINISTRATION
CONFLICT OF INTEREST ON ENERGY POLICY
Bush and Cheney would burden the U.S. with a costly,
out-of-date, and environmentally unsound "19th
century" energy infrastructure based on fossil fuels
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Pointing to yet another Bush Administration
policy designed to enrich former employers and major donors
of the President and Vice President, the Association of State
Green Parties today criticized statements by Vice President
Cheney indicating that this administration will pursue an energy
policy based on 19th century models -- and on dangerous 20th
century nuclear power.
"If Bush and Cheney were judges, lawyers, or even
legislators, they would need to recuse themselves from decisions
of the type they are making," said ASGP Organizing
Coordinator Dean Myerson. "As
with administration non-policy regarding the energy crisis in
California, where the Administration even ignored pleas from
Republican Governors in order to enrich their former employers,
this administration has shown again that it does not have the
interests of Americans at heart, who continually support
renewable energy in polls."
Besides President George W. Bush's family's own vast holdings in
oil companies, Vice President Dick Cheney is a former CEO of
Halliburton. The oil and gas industry contributed $1,846,331 to
Bush's 2000 campaign, and $242,371 to Spencer Abraham's Senate
(Michigan) campaign. After
Abraham lost, Bush appointed him Energy Secretary.
Among candidates, Bush and Abraham received the first and
third highest contributions from these industries. More
information: The Center for Responsive Politics http://www.opensecrets.org/industries/recips.asp?Ind=E01.
The U.S., with 4 percent of the world's population, uses about
25 percent of the world's energy resources.
Instead of conversion to renewable energy, the Bush
Administration is using the California energy crisis and threats
of higher prices -- a result of deregulation in the early 1990s
-- as an excuse to build new nuclear power plants, drill new
reserves in protected natural areas, lay more pipelines, and
mine more coal. Fossil
fuels cause pollution and greenhouse emissions, spoiled natural
areas, and depleted reserves.
Nuclear power plants cannot guarantee safety, and no
facilities exist for disposal of dangerous radioactive waste.
Greens have pushed for a massive conversion to hydrogen fuel
cell technology and low-cost wind turbines, photovoltaic
modules, and solar thermal energy over the next generation,
calling these an urgent necessity in light of increasing global
climate change, which is in part the proven result of human
agency.
ASGP Co-Chair Annie Goeke noted that, "The United States is
already falling behind in key technology sectors due to the
total lack of leadership shown by the Clinton Administration
regarding energy and its obstruction of measures to reverse
global warming. The Bush policy will speed up and mire the U.S.
economy with a 19th century infrastructure as the rest of the
world moves head first into the 21st century."
Greens have called for the following:
1. President Bush
and Vice President Cheney should excuse themselves from
decisions that benefit former employers or major donors. A
non-partisan committee of U.S. Congress members should be
created to replace Bush and Cheney when they must recuse
themselves.
2. The National Research Council should create an emergency
energy panel to analyze the capability of conservation and
renewable sources, such as solar, wind, and fuel cell energy, to
contribute to the U.S. energy supply.
President Bush must reverse his proposal for spending
cuts of 54 percent for solar and 48 percent for wind energy.
Only through a Green energy policy, including the above steps,
can we enact a sane U.S. energy policy and restore hope for a
clean, efficient, and sufficient energy system.
MORE INFORMATION:
The Green Party of New Jersey
http://www.gpnj.org
The Association of
State Green Parties
http://www.greenparties.org
INFORMATION on energy conservation and alternate sources:
(These sites and organizations have no connection
with the Association of State Green Parties)
The Rocky Mountain Institute
http://www.rmi.org/sitepages/pid171.asp
Union of Concerned Scientists
http://www.ucsusa.org/energy/find.ei.html
END |