![]() |
The Green Party of New Jersey Updated February 18, 2000 Position Paper on Garbage |
![]()
Meetings and Events | Join Us | News Update | 10
Key Values | Green Links | Contact Us
Green Chat | Activist Issues | Electoral Issues
| 1998 Green Party Candidates
![]()
Draft Policy Paper: Environmental PolicyWaste Management
Madelyn Hoffman
Background: History
A few summers ago, the United States Supreme Court ruled that it was unconstitutional for states, counties or other solid waste districts to control the flow of garbage within their borders and to require that the garbage be brought to one specific location. This ruling sent shock waves through states, counties and solid waste districts that had contracted to build garbage incinerators, relying on a "put or pay" contractone that required each district to supply a set amount of trash every year for the terms of the contract, anywhere from 10 to 30 years, or else pay a severe financial penalty. New Jersey was one of those states required to find an alternative plan for handling its trash, since five incinerators had been built under the old rules.
This past summer it seemed a foregone conclusion that the Montclair Township Council and other Essex County municipalities would agree to "voluntarily" ship their trash to the Newark garbage incinerator for at least the next 10 years. But a small and vocal group of Montclair residents, joined by long-time activists against incineration and local members of the Green Party, began to express their opposition to this plan at every opportunity.
Sustainable Trash Handling
The Green Party supports the desire of local groups, like Solid Waste Alternative Partners (SWAP), to see trash handled in a sustainable way, not through incineration. Together with local groups, the Greens urged Montclair and other Essex County towns to pursue alternatives that would be cheaper and less harmful to the environment. Towns could implement new recycling and food composting programs and bolster existing programs.
While, unfortunately, Montclair voted to participate in this contract, numerous changes were made to the contract to reflect residents' concerns about recycling and the mandatory "put or pay" provision turned "voluntary" that nearly bankrupted Essex County. Bailing out the incinerator, which if left to compete on the open market would price itself out of business, is neither a safe nor a healthy option. Efforts continue to expand recycling programs and to convince Montclair and other towns that incineration is NOT the way to handle the county's trash.
Residents of Newark and residents of Elizabeth are embroiled in a fight to seriously limit, if not eliminate, the amount of New York City garbage coming to the plant, meaning increased truck traffic, increased pollution risk, and increased risk of accidents. This is an issue of environmental justice.
Local Control of Dumping
The Green Party of New Jersey continues to supported these efforts to stop the incineration of trash, but is also looking more closely at adopting a position on the issue of New Jersey accepting New York City trash, especially in neighborhoods that already have more than their fair share of pollution. In addition to the trash transfer station in use in Elizabeth, there are also plans for Linden to barge in New York City trash and plans to expand the amount of trash brought to the Newark garbage incinerator. While the Interstate Commerce Clause of the U.S. Constitution makes it legally impossible to stop the flow of trash, residents of all three towns want to build as much political support to prevent New York City from dumping on already overburdened communities.