Green Party congressional
candidate Joe Fortunato was curious.
"I wonder if Bill Pascrell will show?" he
asked, as the auditorium inside the United Way building on
South Fullerton Avenue filled up fast.
Most of the residents were elderly. All were gathered
to hear four 8th District congressional candidates and
10th District Rep. Donald Payne speak out on the is-sues.
Two weeks ago, Fortunato had circulated a letter
inviting Republican Party candidate Anthony Fusco and Rep.
William Pascrell Jr. to debate the issues in public. Fusco
agreed. As did Independent Party candidate Viji Sargis.
Yet, although Pascrell issued a statement saying that he
would be "more than willing to debate any and all
candidates on the ballot for this November's
election," the incumbent Democratic congressman was
not specific in giving a date, time or place where such a
debate would be held.
Just prior to Monday's "Meet The Candidates"
forum sponsored by the Montclair chapter of the AARP, a
silver-haired man in a navy blue suit made his way to the
front of the auditorium. He kissed a woman on the cheek,
mingled briefly, then stuck out his hand and introduced
himself.
"I'm Congressman Bill Pascrell," he said.
Each of the candidates was given eight minutes to
speak. Payne, who is running un-opposed in the upcoming
election in November, led off and set the tone of the
forum by bringing up the overriding issue that was on the
minds of every elderly resident present - health care.
"I think the most important thing we can do right
now, because we have such a great economy, is that we
ought to shore our Social Security and Medicare,"
Payne said. "These HMOs are for the birds."
Likening HMOs to "rationed care... when your
ration runs out, you're finished," Payne called for a
"real prescription drug benefit" that could be
provided through Medicare. His comments drew applause
during three separate intervals of his eight-minute
speech.
Fortunato's views on health-care reform drew multiple
rounds of applause as well. Echoing the Green Party's
platform to "rehash our health care in a nonprofit
mode," Fortunato emphasized that "health care is
a right for all of us," which drew loud applause from
the elderly residents in attendance.
Then he compared health care in the United States to
the universal health-care system in Canada. Fortunato said
that while "28 percent" of health-care funds are
used toward administration costs in the United States,
Canada uses "11 percent" to fund administration
costs.
"I've had one report that many seniors are going
across the border, into Canada, where they can save 63
percent on their prescription drugs," Fortunato said.
"This is an outrage. We call for universal health
care from the cradle to the nursing home, and a
single-payer system like we have in Canada."
Pascrell followed Fortunato to the podium. And after
presenting his AARP membership card for all to see and
pointing out that he is "a card-carrying member of
the AARP," the incumbent congressman who is seeking a
second consecutive term admitted that the United States
"simply cannot afford" universal health care for
everyone. Not "tomorrow," anyway.
"So how dare anyone entice us into thinking that
the government can take care of this and spend themselves
out of existence again," Pascrell said, adding that
he supports President Bill Clinton's proposal to use
budget surplus funds and extend prescription drug benefits
through Medicare.
"It doesn't break the bank," Pascrell said of
the president's proposal. "If we do not have tax cuts
and exceed $1.4 trillion, we can pay for this and we can
extend the program through Medicare.
"No one says that Medicare should not be
reformed," the congressman added. "It's
estimated that there's $25 billion in fraud. We can't
accept this. But we can't say that we can throw money at
the problem."
Independent Party candidate Viji Sargis marked her
portion of the forum by saying that the day was Mahatma
Gandhi's birthday. Sargis, a professor at Montclair State
University, Rutgers University and William Paterson
University, called for "equal pay for equal
work" and nonviolent solutions to the world's
problems. Closer to home, Sargis touched on health care,
but spent much of her eight minutes telling the audience
about her family.
"Health is the most important thing," Sargis
said. "I want my children and their children to have
the pleasure of knowing my parents and my parents-in-law.
They are wonderful people. And grandparents are important
in children's lives."
Sargis also drew laughter when she pointed out the
discrepancy between the standard three-year membership to
the AARP, and Pascrell's admission after presenting his
AARP card that his membership was through 2006.
"I found it interesting that the congressman's
AARP membership was for 2006, when the AARP chairman said
that membership was only for three years. So it must be
special for Congress people," she said.
Republican Party candidate Anthony Fusco seemed to
strike a nerve among the elderly audience with his
personal "horror story" about the Fusco family
HMO plan. Fusco's father, Anthony Sr., who he said died
from cancer, suffered a heart attack prior to his death.
"My father didn't live to see me have the honor of
running [for Congress]," Fusco said. "Whether I
win or not, he wasn't around because of the abuse of the
HMO.
"He had a heart attack," Fusco added of his
father, who lived in Hanover. "He was in a hospital
in Morristown. Do you know that they kicked him out of the
hospital. The doctor says, 'You gotta go. They won't pay
for you anymore.' He came back, and he lasted one day in
my mother's house. And he had another heart attack. But
for the great services provided in Hanover, he would have
died on the spot. Died right on the spot.
"Sue HMOs?" Fusco asked loudly. "You're
darned right. We have the right to sue the damned
bureaucrats who are spending your money and don't know
what to do with it."
After Fusco finished up the speaker's portion, the
forum was turned over to the audience for questions.
One audience member asked when Congress was going to
get around to "lowering the cost of assisted living.
I think that's the way most of us would like to go,"
she said.
Another disagreed with Pascrell's claim that the United
States government can't afford to pay for universal health
care "tomorrow morning."
"We couldn't afford Social Security in 1933, but
somehow we did," the man said.
Greg Pason, the Saddle Brook-based Socialist Party
candidate for U.S. senator, wondered aloud if the
presidential debate and other such forums were open to
include all political parties, candidates and views. Pason
is running on the platform of free education, military
budget cuts, the abolition of the death penalty and
"guaranteed universal health care."
Fusco agreed that the presidential and other debates
should be open to a multitude of parties, not just the
Republicans and the Democrats, and he reiterated,
"I'm willing to openly debate anybody at any
time."
But the question of the day, from former Montclair
resident Thelma S. Brown, was more of a rhetorical sign of
the times than a question.
"I have a prescription drug that costs me $103 for
30 [tablets]," she said. "I have a friend that's
a retired federal employee. He gets the same drugs, not
only tablets, for $20. Now tell me if I'm missing
something."
Fusco answered Brown, who not only admitted to being 87
years old, but said that she had been born in Montclair
and raised in the same neighborhood "with the Fusco
family," and now lives in East Orange. Fusco admitted
that it wasn't Brown who was missing out, but the
government.
"These are the types of things that for eight
years should have been addressed," Fusco said.
"You should not pay more when some other American is
paying the same price."
Brown wouldn't specify whether or not she was satisfied
with the candidates' views or their answers.
"I just wanted to come here and put my question to
them," she said.
"Besides," Brown added, "I'm old enough
to ask them anything I need to."